Terence Tao, a UCLA professor thought-about to be the āworldās biggest dwelling mathematician,ā final month in contrast ChatGPTās o1 reasoning mannequin to a āmediocre, however not utterly incompetentā graduate scholar that would accurately reply a fancy evaluation downside with ālots of hints and prodding.ā
AI would possibly by no means beat its human academics, he now tells The Atlantic. āOne key distinction [today] between graduate college students and AI is that graduate college students be taught. You inform an AI its strategy doesnāt work, it apologizes, it’ll possibly briefly appropriate its course, however typically it simply snaps again to the factor it tried earlier than.ā
The excellent news for math prodigies, provides Tao, is that AI and mathematicians will extra probably all the time be collaborators, the place as a substitute of changing math nerds, AI will allow them to discover large-scale, beforehand unreachable issues. Says Tao of the longer term, āYou may need a challenge and ask, āWhat if I do that strategy?ā And as a substitute of spending hours and hours truly making an attempt to make it work, you inform a GPT to do it for you.ā